A plan for tackling closing auction outages

Market structure

Closing auction outages are rare, but they do happen. While recent regulatory efforts have been aimed at outages during normal trading hours, more needs to be done to protect the closing auction. We support an alternative pan-European closing mechanism, but for it to work listing exchanges need to cooperate with their peers.

A plan for tackling closing auction outages

A technical glitch at one of Europe’s largest exchanges last week underlined the need for our industry to prepare for sudden disruptions to our trading infrastructure. For three hours on 13 June, trading was 

 on SIX Swiss Exchange, its most serious outage in a decade. Optiver supports recent regulatory efforts to minimize the impact of outages. In a 
series
 of 
papers
, we have called on exchanges to adopt clear and consistent approaches for handling technical issues and changes that could impact operational stability.

Yet more needs to be done to protect the closing auction, which is the most hectic, and arguably the most important, period of the trading day. When you consider that end-of-day auctions attract around 15% of total European equity volumes — spiking to 25% on major option-expiry and index-rebalance days – the possibility of an outage hitting the closing auction is a serious concern.

While we applaud regulatory efforts to push exchanges to adopt standardized playbooks for outages that occur during normal trading hours, we are surprised that guidance related to the close is so sparse.

Closing auction outages are rare, but they do happen. On 16 November, 2022, a technical issue prevented 

 from establishing a closing price for securities listed across four of its Scandinavian exchanges. Roughly two years earlier, a major glitch at 
Euronext
 froze a large chunk of the EU equity market for four hours and left the exchange unable to calculate a closing price.

In the event of a technical glitch, markets still need to perform the vital function of setting price benchmarks for mutual funds and ETFs, as well as settlement prices for derivative contracts. When an unresolvable outage hits the closing auction, we believe listing markets should collaborate with the industry and support an alternative pan-European closing mechanism. Doing so would show that listing markets can set aside commercial considerations to act in the best interests of the market.

There’s a precedent for a market-led closing-auction back-up. Under a plan 

 as recently as November, US exchanges can step in to run each other’s close. Of course European markets have a very different structure from their US peers. That means it may take some time for participants to get comfortable with a back-up system.

For example, smaller or regional brokers might have to establish new direct or indirect market connections to an alternative closing auction venue and modify their post-trade set ups. The back-up auction operator may need to admit securities that it does not already offer for trading to create a truly pan-European back-up. It may also have to distribute additional closing-auction data, which may lead to greater costs for trading firms.

But these challenges are hardly insurmountable. Proper testing by market participants would go a long way toward overcoming them. What’s clear is that a market-backed alternative closing auction would be more reliable than other solutions like delaying the close or using the last traded price — both suggested in a recent 

. A back-up auction would also deliver better outcomes than a pan-European consolidated tape.

If an auction is delayed too far into the evening it could wreak havoc on stock options exercise prices, which generally expire in the early evening. This could prevent options market makers from properly hedging their exposures, potentially leading to significant market shocks. The last traded price or consolidated tape also may not be accurate closing-price benchmarks, especially if an outage occurs early in the day and market-moving news hits in the interim.

For this to work, listing exchanges need to cooperate with their peers. For instance, derivatives-market operators, mutual fund and ETF issuers would have to recognize the prices set by an alternative closing facility as a benchmark for their products. Regulators could speed this along by requiring stock markets to designate responsibility for their closing auctions under certain outage conditions.

While market participants shouldn’t necessarily be forced to connect to the back-up facility, we believe it would eventually become best practice. All this requires effort on the part of the industry, but that should be weighed against the alternative: scrambling for a back-up when the next closing auction goes wrong.

Further reading

  • A news 
    article
     on the SIX Swiss Exchange outage
  • pair
     of Optiver 
    papers
     on building resilience in European equity markets
  • A news 
    article
     about the closing auction outage at Nasdaq Nordics
  • An ESMA 
    consultation
    on market outages

Button

AMS_Corporate

To discuss this paper – or any other market structure topic – reach out to the Optiver Corporate Strategy team at 

AMS_CorporateStrategy@optiver.com

Disclaimer

Optiver V.O.F. (‘Optiver’) is a market maker licensed by the Dutch Authority for Financial Markets to engage in the investment activity of dealing on own account. This communication and all information contained herein, including any attachments, are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual addressee(s) or, on a need to know basis, their employees and directly appointed agents. This document is for informational purposes only. It is not a recommendation to engage in investment activities and must not be relied upon when making any investment decisions. This document has been provided to you without charge for your convenience only. All information contained in this material is factual information and does not reflect any opinion or judgement of Optiver. This document does not take into account the investment objectives or financial situation of any particular third-party. All investments involve risk and no portion of this document should be interpreted as legal, financial, tax, or accounting advice, and should not be construed as an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation to buy or sell any future, option, swap, or other derivative or financial instrument. There are no warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any information provided herein. Optiver does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of any information or opinions in this document. Any trading activity conducted with Optiver shall at all times be subject to the current Optiver Terms of Business. Please contact your Optiver representative for a copy of the latest version of these terms of business.

Insights Related Articles

Building stronger European equity markets

Market structure

Lit continuous trading in European equities is declining. This is a trend that needs to be understood and analysed so that we can identify the causes and potential impact on end investors and market quality. Lit continuous order books, where buyers and sellers trade against displayed quotes, are a fundamental part of how prices are formed. Their health matters to everyone who participates in European equity markets.

Despite accounting for just 4% of the EU’s population, the Netherlands has emerged as a critical gateway for European capital markets through decades of investment in market infrastructure, liquidity and participation. Its success provides a blueprint for policymakers seeking to deepen and integrate Europe’s capital markets.

For the past several years, US stock investors have hedged their portfolios largely by looking at their calendars. Fed meetings, CPI prints, elections – whenever an event appeared on the horizon, investors would look to short-dated options to protect against the possibility of volatility.

While Brazil’s securities borrowing and lending framework has its strengths, it still trails global peers. In this paper, we propose steps to modernize the country’s SBL system, without compromising safety.

Why trade execution still matters

Market structure

UK and EU regulators are set to reverse historic ‘unbundling’ rules. But while the rules were imperfect, we believe real strides were made in getting investors to pay attention to trading costs. Now more than ever, traders need to carefully choose the right execution partners and strategy.

More abundant and deeper liquidity in cleared swaps markets is achievable with incremental changes and targeted adjustments to rules governing swaps trading. This paper explores practical policy recommendations to achieve this goal.

Click below

Learn more about Optiver